Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:46:51 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: -mno-cygwin and C++ -- solved!
Message-ID:	<20010329234651.A10894@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010328223246 DOT A4677 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010329220109 DOT 29265B-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1010329220109.29265B-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:03:14PM -0600

On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:03:14PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote:
>On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> Sometimes I think that the best way to handle all of this is to have a
>> completely different compiler which defaults to a totally separate
>> /usr/include and /usr/lib area.  i686-pc-mingw-gcc.  Hmm.  It has a nice
>> ring to it.
>
>Hmmm ... could it be because it makes perfect sense ;-? Seriously, this
>is what I used to recommend to anyone who'd ask for a "build environment"
>for Mingw. Glad to see I'm not the only one ...

Wasn't --mno-cygwin a Geoff Noer invention?

Would I cause a massive volcanic eruption if I ripped --mno-cygwin out
of gcc and just suggested that people ran the mingw version of gcc?
I guess we'd then be subjected to pathname complaints...

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -