Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/03/24/22:05:41
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 06:53:08PM -0800, Paul Garceau wrote:
>
>
>On 25 Mar 2001, at 14:21, the Illustrious Danny Smith wrote:
>
>>
>> --- Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote: > On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at
>> 01:44:27PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: > >cgf wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 25,
>> 2001 at 11:53:24AM +1200, Danny Smith wrote: > >>> Thanks for the
>> upgrade to 2.95.3 > >>> > >>>2.95.3-1 works on my testcases with
>> -mno-cygwin. > >> > >with > >>>(2) explicit -I/usr/include/g++-3 to
>> find G++ headers > > > >> This directory is searched automatically. You
>> shouldn't need the -I. > >> cgf > > > >It *is* without the -mno-cygwin,
>> but with > > > >g++ -c -H -mno-cygwin test_gcc.cpp > >I get: > > Sorry.
>> It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly. Doesn't it > make
>> sense to put the mingw headers there? Are the headers generic > enough
>> that this doesn't matter?
>>
>> The g++ headers in cygwin are *identical* to the ones that gcc make
>> install put in my mingw package.
>>
>> I think you'll probably want the
>> > g++-v3 headers from the mingw release in /usr/include/mingw/g++-v3.
>
> I would agree with this (Me Too! <eg>), but then I think that anything
>mingw related (that uses the -mno-cygwin switch) should be kept apart
>from the Cygwin libs as much as possible...the directory structure is
>already there, might as well use it. /usr/include/mingw/g++-v3 works
>for me.
Thanks, Paul. I should have included you in the "I need a decision"
email.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -