Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:38:08 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: GCC 2.95.3-1 available for testing -- question for Earnie
Message-ID:	<20010324213808.A28123@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010324210440 DOT A2203 AT redhat DOT com> <20010325022107 DOT 17525 DOT qmail AT web6403 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010325022107.17525.qmail@web6403.mail.yahoo.com>; from danny_r_smith_2001@yahoo.co.nz on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200

On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 02:21:07PM +1200, Danny Smith wrote:
>> Sorry.  It searches /usr/includw/mingw/g++-3 explicitly.  Doesn't it
>> make sense to put the mingw headers there?  Are the headers generic
>> enough that this doesn't matter?  
>
>The g++ headers in cygwin are *identical* to the ones that gcc make install put
>in my mingw package.

How have you verified that?  Did you actually diff the directories?

Regardless, I guess I have to defer to Earnie as to whether we should use the
/usr/include/g++-3 directory or the /usr/include/mingw/g++-3 directory.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -