Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:47:19 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
Message-ID:	<20010320134719.D32182@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<B7536E2DB26AD211A42500104BB49C72F604D9 AT manbarapp1 DOT intgame DOT com> <008701c0b081$1d5085a0$9865fea9 AT timayum4srqln4> <018901c0b0bb$0e2d8110$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <006b01c0b0f6$f83a2f20$9865fea9 AT timayum4srqln4> <20010320091947 DOT I32706 AT redhat DOT com> <001101c0b14c$82ade840$9865fea9 AT timayum4srqln4>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<001101c0b14c$82ade840$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4>; from tprince@computer.org on Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 06:46:02AM -0800

On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 06:46:02AM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
>I'm sorry, I didn't mean to imply that you had any authority to get
>those patches accepted.  I was contrasting the gcc-2.95.3 stance of no
>current cygwin support, and the 3.0 stance of accepting David's patches
>when they were perhaps important to other OS.

I didn't mean to imply that *you* were implying...  Nevermind.  We
understand each other...  :-)

I actually didn't know about the "no cygwin support" in 2.95.3.  That's
sort of odd.  I don't know how I missed this.  I guess I always assumed
that I would just be making my own release, based on Mumit's work in
2.95.2.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -