Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<006b01c0b0f6$f83a2f20$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4>
From:	"Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
To:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	"Blythe.Stephen" <Stephen DOT Blythe AT IGT DOT com>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<B7536E2DB26AD211A42500104BB49C72F604D9 AT manbarapp1 DOT intgame DOT com> <008701c0b081$1d5085a0$9865fea9 AT timayum4srqln4> <018901c0b0bb$0e2d8110$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Subject:	Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:33:35 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

We may be thinking of different things.  If Chris Faylor finds that the
standard gcc-2.95.2-gcc-2.95.3.diff works with the cygwin source, that
would be the way to go for anyone who wants the 2.95.3 changes on
cygwin.  I hope I never made any remarks with respect to inclusion of
any changes in cygwin-gcc, other than those about testing 64-bit
alignment.  I did make remarks about the standard gcc-2.95.3 not being
willing to advance beyond cygwin-B20.

Fortunately, the mainline gcc-3.0 snapshots seem much more in favor of
cygwin, but I see that none of the last 3 of David Billingsworth's
patches to make the testsuite go on cygwin have been included in the
distribution as of today.  Maybe tonight at last I'll get all the way
through the g++ suite to see whether 64-bit alignment is breaking
anything there.  It does appear to break a third of the objc tests, but
presents no problem in gcc or g77.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>; "Blythe.Stephen"
<Stephen DOT Blythe AT IGT DOT com>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95.3 is released.


> Tim,
> I may be out of my depth here, but I thought the flat rejection went
> like "get the patches into gcc, not into cygwin-gcc because we
_already_
> have far too many outstanding differences with gcc"
>
> Rob



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -