Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2001 13:18:32 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: FW: gcc-2.95.3 is released.
Message-ID:	<20010319131832.A19287@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<B7536E2DB26AD211A42500104BB49C72F604D9 AT manbarapp1 DOT intgame DOT com> <20010319125625 DOT F18807 AT redhat DOT com> <20010319130606 DOT G18807 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010319130606.G18807@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:06:06PM -0500

On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:06:06PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 12:56:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 01:37:57AM -0800, Blythe.Stephen wrote:
>>>Does anyone know if this includes the cygwin patches?  There is no mention
>>>of it on the announcement page, or of cygwin in the build status page.
>>
>>AFAIK, it does not include any patches that I got from Mumit or any of
>>my work with -mno-cygwin.
>
>Actually, you can remove the AFAIK above.  I've applied the patches that
>upgrade from gcc 2.95.2 to gcc 2.95.3 with no problem so the patches
							     ^
							   cygwin

>were definitely not included.

...not my day for clarity.  It's probably the walking pneumonia...

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -