Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3AB213D5.F3463D7A@yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:23:33 -0500
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Mark Allan Young <myoung AT intrinsic DOT com>
CC:	Cygwin <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: CVS (v1.11) performance on Cygwin 1.1.8
References:	<NDEILJKIAMKIMKIDIGNCGEICCKAA DOT myoung AT intrinsic DOT com>

Mark Allan Young wrote:
> 
> We have a linux server running CVS 1.10.7.
> 
> After upgrading our cygwin distributions, we've noticed that
> the cvs performance has gone complete down the tubes.
> 
> Using a 1.10.8 version of CVS seems to do much better.
> 
> Doing a "cvs co" of our source tree, comprised of 8087 files,
> (127Mb), we see the time go from about 1 minute to four minutes.
> 
> We're running Windows2000 SP1+hotfix.
> 
> we're looking at upgrading our linux server, but I was curious
> if anyone else has run into similar performance problems.
> 

Any virus protection running?

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -