Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From:	"Mark Allan Young" <myoung AT intrinsic DOT com>
To:	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	CVS (v1.11) performance on Cygwin 1.1.8
Date:	Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:47:36 -0800
Message-ID:	<NDEILJKIAMKIMKIDIGNCGEICCKAA.myoung@intrinsic.com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

We have a linux server running CVS 1.10.7.

After upgrading our cygwin distributions, we've noticed that
the cvs performance has gone complete down the tubes.

Using a 1.10.8 version of CVS seems to do much better.

Doing a "cvs co" of our source tree, comprised of 8087 files,
(127Mb), we see the time go from about 1 minute to four minutes.

We're running Windows2000 SP1+hotfix.

we're looking at upgrading our linux server, but I was curious
if anyone else has run into similar performance problems.

thanks.

...myoung

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -