Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:10:21 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Eliminate make's search for sh.exe under Cygwin?
Message-ID:	<20010311161021.A24889@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3AAA45B1 DOT 169DD8E5 AT yahoo DOT com> <JEEDKLJIAHHJEMMDJMOBAECMCBAA DOT shalidor AT cfl DOT rr DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<JEEDKLJIAHHJEMMDJMOBAECMCBAA.shalidor@cfl.rr.com>; from shalidor@cfl.rr.com on Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:09:15PM -0500

On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 04:09:15PM -0500, Marcus A Martin wrote:
>Some more.

Argyle.

cgf

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
>> [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd
>> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:18 AM
>> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
>> Subject: Re: Eliminate make's search for sh.exe under Cygwin?
>>
>>
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >
>> > Recent posts in the cygwin mailing list have pointed to the fact that
>> > make is pretty slow and have mentioned that make takes some time
>> > searching for sh.exe.
>> >
>> > I'm not sure why make, running under Cygwin, goes out of its way to
>> > search for sh.exe on the PATH.  Maybe this is a holdover from the times
>> > when there wasn't necessarily a /bin in the Cygwin distributions.  It's
>> > possible that Red Hat may even distribute things that way -- but I can
>> > take care of that.
>> >
>> > I am thinking that we can probably rip out most of the logic currently
>> > in make for finding a shell in the path and just let it use /bin/sh when
>> > MAKE_MODE=unix or find command.com/cmd.exe when MAKE_MODE=win32.
>> >
>> > Does this sound like a good plan?  Am I missing something?  Will having
>> > make operate more like UNIX cause some problem that I'm not aware of?
>> >
>>
>> Hmm...  I seem to recall that make goes through lots of extra logic when
>> WIN32 is defined so perhaps the removal of that definition alone will
>> help.  (I haven't looked recently.)  Perhaps you should ask the "cause
>> some problem" question internally at sources.redhat?  I can't fathom
>> that it would cause problems for the normal "I want UNIX or bust" user.
>>
>> Earnie.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -