delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
From: | "Marcus A Martin" <shalidor AT cfl DOT rr DOT com> |
To: | "Earnie Boyd" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: Eliminate make's search for sh.exe under Cygwin? |
Date: | Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:09:15 -0500 |
Message-ID: | <JEEDKLJIAHHJEMMDJMOBAECMCBAA.shalidor@cfl.rr.com> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) |
Importance: | Normal |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.3018.1300 |
In-Reply-To: | <3AAA45B1.169DD8E5@yahoo.com> |
Some more. Marcus > -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com > [mailto:cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com]On Behalf Of Earnie Boyd > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 10:18 AM > To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Subject: Re: Eliminate make's search for sh.exe under Cygwin? > > > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > > > Recent posts in the cygwin mailing list have pointed to the fact that > > make is pretty slow and have mentioned that make takes some time > > searching for sh.exe. > > > > I'm not sure why make, running under Cygwin, goes out of its way to > > search for sh.exe on the PATH. Maybe this is a holdover from the times > > when there wasn't necessarily a /bin in the Cygwin distributions. It's > > possible that Red Hat may even distribute things that way -- but I can > > take care of that. > > > > I am thinking that we can probably rip out most of the logic currently > > in make for finding a shell in the path and just let it use /bin/sh when > > MAKE_MODE=unix or find command.com/cmd.exe when MAKE_MODE=win32. > > > > Does this sound like a good plan? Am I missing something? Will having > > make operate more like UNIX cause some problem that I'm not aware of? > > > > Hmm... I seem to recall that make goes through lots of extra logic when > WIN32 is defined so perhaps the removal of that definition alone will > help. (I haven't looked recently.) Perhaps you should ask the "cause > some problem" question internally at sources.redhat? I can't fathom > that it would cause problems for the normal "I want UNIX or bust" user. > > Earnie. > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > Want to unsubscribe from this list? > Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > > -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |