Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2001 23:33:19 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: cross compiler for Cygwin
Message-ID:	<20010309233319.A8993@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010309225502 DOT A3200 AT redhat DOT com> <Pine DOT HPP DOT 3 DOT 96 DOT 1010309222131 DOT 14734C-100000 AT hp2 DOT xraylith DOT wisc DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.HPP.3.96.1010309222131.14734C-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>; from khan@NanoTech.Wisc.EDU on Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:26:35PM -0600

On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 10:26:35PM -0600, Mumit Khan wrote:
>That's one great thing about the one-tree build that RedHat/Cygnus uses,
>no hassle builds for a myriad a of host-target combos. And that's why
>embedded system developers pay for commercial support, the cost of which
>may seem atrocious when you first see it, but you soon find out that it's 
>well worth it.

I hope someday we can truly make gcc.gnu.org/sources.redhat.com "one tree".
It's a little cumbersome right now with part of the tree on gcc.gnu.org:/cvs/gcc
and part on sources.redhat.com:/cvs/src/src

I do have a unified cvs repository that seems to work at "/cvs/uberbaum"
on sources.redhat.com.  It seems to work ok but it is not fully functional
as far as merging the different modules from gdb, gcc, binutils, etc.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -