Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3AA8D8B1.A873899@yahoo.com>
Date:	Fri, 09 Mar 2001 08:20:49 -0500
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	Earnie Boyd <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Ralf Fassel <ralf AT akutech DOT de>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: different behaviour of bash and sh
References:	<15015 DOT 59568 DOT 965521 DOT 675165 AT jupiter DOT akutech-local DOT de>
	<3AA8CFB3 DOT 4B515116 AT yahoo DOT com> <15016 DOT 54025 DOT 593153 DOT 95134 AT jupiter DOT akutech-local DOT de>

Ralf Fassel wrote:
> 
> * Earnie Boyd
> | In the Cygwin release
> |
> | sh != bash
> | sh == ash
> 
> And `ash' is supposed to return 0 for $? of `false'?
> 

I wasn't saying ash does or doesn't have a bug; I was pointing your
fallacy especially to the bash-bugs list.  If you feel that ash is
incorrect then please, download the source, fix it, submit a patch to
cygwin-apps AT cygwin DOT com for consideration.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -