Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<001901c0a815$59834a90$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Alexandre Oliva" <oliva AT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br>
Cc:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
	"Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>, <autoconf AT gnu DOT org>,
	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20010307161214 DOT A20717 AT redhat DOT com><orn1axvuu4 DOT fsf AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br><3AA74730 DOT D4C575FC AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu><ork860sfhi DOT fsf AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br><006d01c0a7c5$dd3b97c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <orsnkoqur3 DOT fsf AT guarana DOT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br>
Subject:	Re: Detecting the need for -mwin32 in newer cygwin gcc's
Date:	Fri, 9 Mar 2001 08:18:38 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	08 Mar 2001 21:08:53.0267 (UTC) FILETIME=[FAD7DE30:01C0A813]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexandre Oliva" <oliva AT lsd DOT ic DOT unicamp DOT br>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
Cc: "Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>; "Christopher Faylor"
<cgf AT redhat DOT com>; <autoconf AT gnu DOT org>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: Detecting the need for -mwin32 in newer cygwin gcc's


>
> The only issue is whether to provide that macro in GNU autoconf or let
> it evolve separately in the macro archive.  I think the latter is a
> better approach, at least for now.
>

Sure. I've got no problems with that.

Rob




--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -