Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 20:05:45 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Cc:	DJ Delorie <dj AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: patch problem with forward/backward slashes in patch file
Message-ID:	<20010307200545.B32524@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, DJ Delorie <dj AT redhat DOT com>
References:	<kh2bat4jjv8j6e1vtgdq6jrsj8s02o4co2 AT 4ax DOT com> <4nrbat4k7l19ndugn851cro7072ai9ftqt AT 4ax DOT com> <20010307111525 DOT E18117 AT redhat DOT com> <329dat08cnf9q6i137l3udjhe0di2ehpd5 AT 4ax DOT com> <20010307170352 DOT B30908 AT redhat DOT com> <ukldats967ca5jfcqg7eevrc2t0m8323oa AT 4ax DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<ukldats967ca5jfcqg7eevrc2t0m8323oa@4ax.com>; from d.rees.l@usa.net on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 04:51:37PM -0800

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 04:51:37PM -0800, David Rees wrote:
>>>Maybe its a version issue? Anyway, the obvious solution is always use
>>>-p0.
>>
>>I don't think so.  I have never seen patch behave in this fashion.  It
>>doesn't work this way on Linux, AFAICT.
>
>Fair enough (the diffutils manual is dated 1993). Should I try and
>report it somehow? I have no idea where to report GNU doc bugs.

Hmm.  I don't know either.  It's great that you're thinking like this,
though.

Maybe DJ will know since you're actually referencing his web page.  :-)

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -