Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 7 Mar 2001 12:23:05 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	Cygwin ML <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: return value of log()
Message-ID:	<20010307122305.H21275@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin ML <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<m37l21hosy DOT wl AT nifty DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<m37l21hosy.wl@nifty.com>; from muraken2@nifty.com on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:10:53PM +0900

On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 07:10:53PM +0900, Kenta MURATA wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> I can't understand that log(x) returns -HUGE_VAL if x < 0.
> Becaus, IEEE definition returns NaN.
> 
> Why adopt this implementation?

In the newlib sources I found:

  /* Check for domain error here. */
  if (x <= 0.0)
    {
      errno = ERANGE;
      return (z_notanum.d);
    }

and AFAICS z_notanum is different from -HUGE_VAL. I suggest asking
in the newlib mailing list mailto:newlib AT sources DOT redhat DOT com

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -