Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 4 Mar 2001 17:50:29 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: An easy (but possibly time-consuming) test case for Make hanging (was: Re: Make hung in WaitForMultipleObjects inside Cygwin)
Message-ID:	<20010304175029.A7482@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20010228155722 DOT 21696 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010228162324 DOT 21997 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010228163528 DOT 22101 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010301210358 DOT 31563 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010302185213 DOT 19881 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <22288145100 DOT 20010302222958 AT logos-m DOT ru> <20010302193602 DOT 22711 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com> <20010304211455 DOT 5961 DOT qmail AT lizard DOT curl DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010304211455.5961.qmail@lizard.curl.com>; from jik@curl.com on Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:14:55PM -0500

On Sun, Mar 04, 2001 at 04:14:55PM -0500, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
>I've found that if you put the Makefile shown below into an empty
>directory on a dual-processor machine running Cygwin 1.1.8-2 and Make
>3.79.1-2 and run "while true; do make -j2; done", you'll eventually
>get a Make process hung as I described in my messages last week
>(although it may take a couple of days).  You know things are hung
>when output stops in the window in which you run the "while" loop.
>
>I've reach the limit of my ability to debug this further.  Could
>someone with more knowledge of Cygwin internals try to duplicate this,
>using this test case?

In case someone is expecting the "someone with more knowledge" to be me,
I wanted to let everyone know that I'm not planning on debugging this
and will be interested in seeing who might be stepping forward to
give it a go.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -