delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/03/02/07:23:59

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From: <earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID: <3A9F90BD.93F5F9A0@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 07:23:25 -0500
From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To: Earnie Boyd <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: New symlinks.
References: <5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010301173204 DOT 02448c90 AT mailhost> <3A9F0AA7 DOT 6AFCC739 AT yahoo DOT com> <20010301215554 DOT A7181 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:51:19PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> >John Paulson wrote:
> >>
> >> $ cat `type -p gcc` | wc
> >> cat: /usr/bin/gcc: No such file or directory
> >>        0       0       0
> >>
> >> -- Hmmm... A user might think something broke.  I have not done a search
> >>     of the archives to determine how often this asymmetry has been noted
> >>     by users.  I don't recall having seen this mentioned in the year or so
> >>     I've been subscribed, but then most of neurons have been fried by MFC...
> >>
> >
> >If you really want to review the negative chatter about this you should
> >visit the autoconf AT gnu DOT org archives.
> 
> Yeah, it is sort of embarrassing that Cygwin works this way, IMO.
> 
> Maybe we should just make foo.exe always == foo if foo does not exist.
> Right now this is only the case for the stat() call.
> 

I know the PROs for doing this.  I can't think of any CONs.  It would
help autoconf only where Cygwin is concerned though, most of the work
would still have to be done for other Win32 targets.  One of the big
headaches currently is the fact that foo.exe and foo/ can exist in the
same directory.  With this foo/ wins the test and makes foo.exe appear
not to exist.  If we could handle this so that foo.exe wins the test it
would really make autoconf happy and may cause the support for other
win32 targets to be put on hold.

> cgf
> (Wow, I don't remember this subject being discussed since 1998 or so...)
> 

Possibly even 1997.  B18 came out in 1997 and was the first version to
create .exe files by default.  It is also the version I first used.

Earnie.

P.S.: I found Cygwin because I was looking for a free C compiler for
Windows.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019