Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2001 21:55:54 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: New symlinks.
Message-ID:	<20010301215554.A7181@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010301173204 DOT 02448c90 AT mailhost> <3A9F0AA7 DOT 6AFCC739 AT yahoo DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A9F0AA7.6AFCC739@yahoo.com>; from earnie_boyd@yahoo.com on Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:51:19PM -0500

On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 09:51:19PM -0500, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>John Paulson wrote:
>> 
>> $ cat `type -p gcc` | wc
>> cat: /usr/bin/gcc: No such file or directory
>>        0       0       0
>> 
>> -- Hmmm... A user might think something broke.  I have not done a search
>>     of the archives to determine how often this asymmetry has been noted
>>     by users.  I don't recall having seen this mentioned in the year or so
>>     I've been subscribed, but then most of neurons have been fried by MFC...
>> 
>
>If you really want to review the negative chatter about this you should
>visit the autoconf AT gnu DOT org archives.

Yeah, it is sort of embarrassing that Cygwin works this way, IMO.

Maybe we should just make foo.exe always == foo if foo does not exist.
Right now this is only the case for the stat() call.

cgf
(Wow, I don't remember this subject being discussed since 1998 or so...)

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -