Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 18:41:48 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Problems using gdb?
Message-ID:	<20010228184148.E5603@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CE9B AT wilber DOT adroit DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<80575AFA5F0DD31197CE00805F650D7602CE9B@wilber.adroit.com>; from drobinow@dayton.adroit.com on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:28:33PM -0500

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 02:28:33PM -0500, Robinow, David wrote:
>> From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:cgf AT redhat DOT com]
>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 10:40:05AM -0800, Andy Piper wrote:
>> ><rant>
>> >My experiences with gdb 5.0 have been generally bad. I had 
>> to rewrite 
>> >cygwin unexec for xemacs to get the june gdb release to not 
>> complain. The 
>> >4.18/9 releases worked fine for me.
>> ></rant>
>> 
>> <rant>
>> Thank you for sharing.  I suppose it is too much to ask that 
>> you try to
>> fix gdb.  It's much more satisfying to rant, I suppose.
>> </rant>
> Yes, I think it probably is too much to ask. Andy has enough
>to do with his XEmacs responsibilities. See
>  http://www.xemacs.org/Develop/jobs.html 

Anyone can use that argument.  Anyone at all.  Anytime at all.
I wonder how free software ever gets developed...

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -