Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<006a01c0a1cd$1d6156e0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E21C AT IIS000> <20010228135244 DOT I8464 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010228110624 DOT B2327 AT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: New symlinks.
Date:	Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:26:27 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	28 Feb 2001 21:17:59.0860 (UTC) FILETIME=[ED555740:01C0A1CB]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: "Cygwin" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2001 3:06 AM
Subject: Re: New symlinks.


> On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 01:52:44PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> another icon ;^). Don't underestimate people using Windows; most of
them are
> >> not idiots and are used to Windows idiosyncrasisms, so when using
cygwin
> >> they can adapt :-)
> >

If they are using cygwin I think a certain amount of adaptation _is
required_. We're not trying to  build a new friendly GUI, we're trying
to take one of the most flexible computing environments and put it on
one of the least :]

> >I wonder...
> >
> >*restrain sarcasm*
> >
> >...anyway, you may be right here ;-)
>
> I HEARTILY disagree with this.  We have repeatedly see the confusion
of people
> on this mailing list on all matter of subjects.  I have no reason to
assume that
> having files with a .lnk extension will be any different -- especially
since
> Microsoft goes out of its way to hide the extension itself.

And Microsoft have been publicly slammed by the security community on
this and a number of related actions because of the reduction in user
environment awareness.

My vote: we expose the.lnk at at least one place in the interface. We
also make it interoperate seamlessly for scripts/batch files etc.
Rob


>
> cgf
>
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
>
>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -