Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<BF35D9C143BCCC4EB63181B67C9320C804DD1F@serv-075.icon-germany.local>
From:	Heribert Dahms <heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de>
To:	"'Corinna Vinschen'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: New symlinks.
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:22:32 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)

Yeah, and what should
	find . | xargs ls -ld
find implicitly and write explicitly?

Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-gmbh DOT de)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Corinna Vinschen [SMTP:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, February 28, 2001 10:07
> To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject:	Re: New symlinks.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:32:01PM -0500, McCunney, Dennis wrote:
> > Why not treat the new symlinks like Unix "." files: the .lnk extension
> is
> > not shown in a standard directory list, but _will_ be shown by "ls -a",
> or
> > if the user provides the explicit file name to ls.
> 
> That's my point. Not with `ls -a' but explicitely.
> 
> Corinna
> 
> -- 
> Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
> Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Red Hat, Inc.
> 
> --
> Want to unsubscribe from this list?
> Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -