Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Feb 2001 11:09:44 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Memory problem
Message-ID:	<20010228110944.C2327@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<230667FC62B4D311BBA90050DA41CFD759D3D2 AT ddipdc DOT ddi DOT nl>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<230667FC62B4D311BBA90050DA41CFD759D3D2@ddipdc.ddi.nl>; from p.boncz@datadistilleries.com on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:26:56PM +0100

On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:26:56PM +0100, Peter Boncz wrote:
>Hi Tony,
>
>NT is a bit more vulnerable regarding memory fragmentation than most Unixes.
>If you want 450MB in one big array, it may happen that the memory space has
>become so fragmented, there is no 450MB slot available anymore in the 2GB or
>virtual memory space that you have at your disposition.

Huh?  No.  Cygwin implements the standard unix sbrk() mechanism.  I don't know
why anything that is NT-specific would enter into this.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -