Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/02/28/07:55:04
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:41:56AM +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux wrote:
> > If "foo.lnk" is a valid shortcut, then I would say the real
> > file "foo" should win. That is, the shortcut would be invisible.
>
> That is IMHO the only consistent behaviour; together with cygwin refusing to
> create a link named foo (that is a WinFile named foo.lnk) if foo already
> exists (sorry Corinna, it's perhaps already done this way but I can't
> check). Cygwin should also refuse creating a file named foo if a link named
> foo (that is a WinFile named foo.lnk which is a valid shortcut) already
> exist.
Yup. Both is handled that way.
> another icon ;^). Don't underestimate people using Windows; most of them are
> not idiots and are used to Windows idiosyncrasisms, so when using cygwin
> they can adapt :-)
I wonder...
*restrain sarcasm*
...anyway, you may be right here ;-)
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -