Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/02/27/06:06:53
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 01:03:29PM +0100, Jesper Eskilson wrote:
> Jesper Eskilson <jojo AT virtutech DOT se> writes:
>
> > Why is it ok to seek to 0 bytes and 1 byte, but not 2?
>
> The test-program passed parameters in the wrong order, the correct order is
>
> lseek(fd, pos, whence)
>
> However, this was not the error I was really trying to fix (the real
> program passed the parameters in the correct order). The real problem was
> that lseek() fails when doing SEEK_END on a raw device. On Linux and
> Solaris, lseek() return 0 when doing SEEK_END on raw devices.
I just checked on Linux. It returns 0 when offset is 0. otherwise
it returns -1. The difference between file and device is that the
return value is 0 on the raw drive and > 0 on the file. I could
check in an appropriate patch which is easy but I want to discuss
this on cygwin-patches first.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -