Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/02/24/19:04:17
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:33:16PM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Chris Faylor wrote:
>>However, the only way the problem is going to be narrowed down is if
>>you, or someone, debugs sockscap. The sources *must* be available
>>given Cygwin's licensing agreement.
>
>Not really -- see my other message. Sockscap doesn't link or use
>cygwin itself -- it modifies the networking layer of the machine on
>which it is installed. Actually, that means that on MADHU's machine,
>*cygwin* is using *sockscap*, not the other way around. So cygwin's
>license doesn't apply.
Yeah, your message crossed mine. Thanks for doing the research.
I stand corrected.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -