delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-Id: | <4.3.1.2.20010222154849.02f26d10@pop.ma.ultranet.com> |
X-Sender: | lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com |
X-Mailer: | QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 |
Date: | Thu, 22 Feb 2001 15:52:00 -0500 |
To: | "Mark Hadfield" <m DOT hadfield AT niwa DOT cri DOT nz>, <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
From: | "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Symlinks, executability, system attribute, etc (was Re: |
[ANNOUNCEMENT]) | |
In-Reply-To: | <00e601c09d10$379e4250$d938a8c0@Hadfield> |
References: | <20010221232921 DOT X908 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> |
<000a01c09c73$7a43ce10$d938a8c0 AT Hadfield> | |
<20010221212656 DOT F7576 AT redhat DOT com> | |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
At 03:44 PM 2/22/2001, Mark Hadfield wrote: >Another thought about symlinks, executability etc. IF a change like >Corinna's proposal is adopted and IF some time in the future support for >current-style symlinks is dropped (or can be turned off optionally) then >Cygwin will know that all symlinks have the extension .lnk and it will no >longer need to use the system attribute for that purpose. Could the Windows >system attribute then be used to indicate executability,i.e. the rule would >be that a file is executable if the extension is .exe etc OR the system >attribute is set. Voila, no need to look inside files for #! True but Cygwin would have to drop the existing symlink convention and either refuse to support it or provide a tool to convert any of the current style to the new to make your proposal reasonable. Its not impossible but I'm guessing the confusion that would ensue will keep it from happening as you suggest, at least for quite a while. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |