Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A954C6E.FF247549@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 22 Feb 2001 12:29:18 -0500
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"MADHU,SURESH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" <suresh_madhu AT hp DOT com>
CC:	"'Earnie Boyd'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: cygwin with sockscap32
References:	<878B7E94C206D511895800A0C9F4871CD5BB19 AT xcup01 DOT cup DOT hp DOT com>

"MADHU,SURESH (HP-Cupertino,ex1)" wrote:
> 
> I think its a cygnus issue. Because the sockscap code has not changed, but
> the cygwin code has - and the sockscap source code is not as open source as
> the cygnus code, 

Yes.  It is and must be -- but perhaps the sockscap owners don't
understand that.  By linking to the cygwin1.dll, the sockscap code is
required to be open source.  If you cannot obtain the source from them,
then it is because the owners are VIOLATING cygwin's license.

They MUST release the code -- if they don't, I'm sure Red Hat's lawyers
would love to talk with them.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -