Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:55:37 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	"'Cygwin Mailing List'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Problems building gcc-2.95.2
Message-ID:	<20010220115537.A29559@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	'Cygwin Mailing List' <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<B7536E2DB26AD211A42500104BB49C72F6044A AT manbarapp1 DOT intgame DOT com> <000d01c09aa2$bec64c20$6767323f AT amr DOT corp DOT intel DOT com> <010401c09b0a$6a3f1070$9865fea9 AT timayum4srqln4>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<010401c09b0a$6a3f1070$9865fea9@timayum4srqln4>; from tprince@computer.org on Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:57:30PM -0800

On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:57:30PM -0800, Tim Prince wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
>To: "Blythe.Stephen" <Stephen DOT Blythe AT IGT DOT com>; "'Cygwin Mailing List'"
><cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 10:35 AM
>Subject: Re: Problems building gcc-2.95.2
>
>
>> Several interesting points were raised, which I am attempting to check
>by
>> building the standard gcc-2.95.3 myself right now.  After reading the
>> messages, I am trying ../configure
>>
>CC='/usr/bin/gcc -mwin32' --host=i686-pc-cygwin --target=i686-pc-cygwin 
>--pr
>> efix=/usr/local/  in an attempt to avoid going into cross compiler
>mode.  I
>> find that my --prefix is being over-ridden to the extent of building
>in
>> /usr/local/i686-pc-cygwin
>
>In the event that anyone is still interested, it's a dirty situation.
>Regardless of choice of --target and --prefix, I found that I had to
>copy all files from include/w32api into gcc-2.95.2/include, except for
>getopt.h,

I'm not sure why this is a surprise.  I've been making continual changes
to gcc's handling of include and lib paths.

Rather than using the brute force method of copying files around, I think
it makes better sense to add the appropriate bits to the gcc specs file.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -