Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/02/19/16:11:40
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:59:15PM +0100, Andrew Markebo wrote:
>/ Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> wrote:
>| [...]
>| Right. And, I have to point out that if you are linking with the Cygwin DLL,
>| *all* of your source has now become GPLed. If you are providing a commercial
>| release of your product you had better make sure that you also make the
>| sources available or you will be in violation of Cygwin's licensing terms.
>
>There seems to be an alternative, mentioned in the FAQ:
>
>"In particular, if you intend to port a proprietary (non-GPL'd)
>application using Cygwin, you will need the proprietary-use license
>for the Cygwin library. This is available for purchase; please contact
>sales AT cygnus DOT com for more information. All other questions should be
>sent to the project mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com. "
Yep. I've mentioned this here recently.
>Hmm BTW Anything under the cygwin dist going under LGPL, or how was
>it.. is the LGPL already ancient, replaced with something else?
There are no plans to changes Cygwin licensing.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -