Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/02/18/00:17:14
On Sat, Feb 17, 2001 at 11:03:02PM -0600, Matthew Smith wrote:
>Sorry, what I'm trying to ask, is if Corinna's patches to tcsh were
>unneccessary?
I don't know. I was asking Corinna this question.
>You're saying that all she had to do was build tcsh from the original
>sources, then link with automode.o?
I was asking her if this would work. Since she knows about automode.o,
et al, I assume that she had a reason for not using it.
>Are there any exceptions to the text in, binary out general rule?
>Also, is automode.o only useful for linking with C code (not C++), as
>binmode.obj is?
automode.o, binmode.o, and textmode.o all affect low-level I/O, the
same way that mounting directories or files affect low-level I/O.
There is no "C" or "C++" component.
Can I suggest that you could just be writing simple test cases to
figure this kind of thing out? The best teacher is experience.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- Raw text -