Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A8AF452.A03C8F1B@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:10:42 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
CC:	"Javorcik, William (ITG)" <William_Javorcik AT ml DOT com>,
	"'Earnie Boyd'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.1.8: du reports incorrect sizes
References:	<5 DOT 0 DOT 2 DOT 1 DOT 0 DOT 20010214154957 DOT 00a8b7f0 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners Inc)" wrote:
> 
> I think that was Earnie's point.  The problem could be caused by the new
> du or the new DLL.  If you would try the old du running against the new
> DLL, this would answer the question of where the problem lies...

I think the confusion here is about the new packaging system.  Packages
such as "fileutils" are now decoupled from the core cygwin.  So, on Jan
31, 2001, cygwin-1.1.8-2 replaced cygwin-1.1.7 as the official core
cygwin package.  On Dec 27, 2000, cygwin-1.1.7 in turn replaced
cygwin-1.1.6 as the official cygwin core package.

Completely asynchronous to this, however, fileutils-4.0-2 replaced
fileutils<no explicit version, based on 3.12> as the official fileutils
binary package for the cygwin platform on Dec 18, 2000.

So, it means very little to say "the fileutils from cygwin-1.1.8".  All
that says is "I updated both cygwin-core and fileutils at some point
after Jan 31, 2001."  The question Earnie want answered is:

Did the fileutils-3.12 ---> 4.0-2 change on Dec 18, 2000 cause  the
problem, or did the cygwin-core change on Dec 27, 2000 or Jan 31, 2001,
or ... cause the problem?

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -