Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Apparently-From:	<earnie?boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Message-ID:	<3A8955E0.1C8E6544@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:42:24 -0500
From:	Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Malcolm Boekhoff <Malcolm DOT Boekhoff AT actfs DOT co DOT uk>
CC:	Cygwin News Group <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Subject:	Re: chmod and ntsec
References:	<852569F1 DOT 005AA916 DOT 00 AT nyc-ntgw-n01 DOT ny DOT jpmorgan DOT com> <004901c095a5$cb7419e0$275c100a AT actfs DOT co DOT uk> <3A89409C DOT ED192DEA AT yahoo DOT com> <007101c095d1$80844730$275c100a AT actfs DOT co DOT uk>

Malcolm Boekhoff wrote:
> 
> So is the definitive, expert answer to use "ntsec" or "ntsec ntea"?
> 

The ntsec flag overrides the ntea flag IIRC.  There is no reason to use
the ntea flag if you use the ntsec flag.  The ntea flag, IMO, should be
removed in the next release as it can cause more consequence than good.

Earnie.

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -