Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 8 Feb 2001 07:47:27 -0500
From:	Chet Ramey <chet AT nike DOT INS DOT CWRU DOT Edu>
To:	cabbey AT bresnanlink DOT net
Subject:	RE: bash: setenv: command not found
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	chet AT po DOT CWRU DOT Edu
Message-ID:	<1010208124727.AA47875.SM@nike.INS.CWRU.Edu>
Read-Receipt-To:	chet AT po DOT CWRU DOT Edu
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-In-Reply-To:	Message from cabbey AT bresnanlink DOT net of Wed, 7 Feb 2001 22:42:58 -0600 (CST) (id <Pine DOT LNX DOT 4 DOT 21 DOT 0102072236010 DOT 22103-100000 AT tweedle DOT cabbey DOT net>)

> the answers to your question.
> 
> setenv/unsetenv are commands that are built into the csh family
> of shells. Under bash the equivalent built ins are export and
> unset. For example:
> 
> CSH:  setenv name value
> BASH: export name=value
> 
> CSH:  unsetenv name
> BASH: unset name
> 
> <soapbox>
> yes, this is a stupid naming convention, and it's one
> of the things I hate the most about shells... every one
> has a different version, and different syntax. There
> needs to be ONE standard, and I'm sorry to say BASH's
> answer isn't an answer; here csh got it right.
> </soapbox>

Why do you say that csh is right and bash is wrong?

-- 
``The lyf so short, the craft so long to lerne.'' - Chaucer
( ``Discere est Dolere'' -- chet)

Chet Ramey, CWRU    chet AT po DOT CWRU DOT Edu    http://cnswww.cns.cwru.edu/~chet/

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -