Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Tue, 6 Feb 2001 16:18:43 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Setup loads gcc-2.95.2-6 over gcc 2.95.2-7 (was Re: libuser32.a left out of latest Cygwin distro?)
Message-ID:	<20010206161843.D9738@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<4 DOT 3 DOT 2 DOT 7 DOT 0 DOT 20010206152845 DOT 00b08470 AT irispavp DOT igb DOT umontreal DOT ca>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<4.3.2.7.0.20010206152845.00b08470@irispavp.igb.umontreal.ca>; from bleau@igb.umontreal.ca on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:53:25PM -0500

On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 03:53:25PM -0500, Andre Bleau wrote:
>Setup 2.29 always proposes to load gcc 2.95.2-6, even if you have gcc 
>2.95.2-7 installed. This bug is independent of the mirror used (I tried 6 
>or 7 different mirrors).

Sigh.  That's because I made gcc 2.95.2-7 a test release despite the fact
that I said that it wasn't.  Sorry about that.

Given the problems that people are reporting with this, I think I'll keep
the test designation on 2.95.2-7 for a while.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -