Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<200102060134.f161Ywq04021@capella.ssd.hal.com>
Subject:	Re: misdefined macro _T in winnt.h
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 17:34:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<3A79EED1.94E903E7@yahoo.com> from "Earnie Boyd" at Feb 01, 2001 06:18:41 PM
From:	"J. J. Farrell" <jjf AT bcs DOT org DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version:	1.0

> From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
> 
> "J. J. Farrell" wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Earnie Boyd <earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com>
> > >
> > > Eric Paire wrote:
> > > >
> > > > ------  Cut Here  ------  Cut Here  ------  Cut Here  ------
> > > >  #define __DIR "dir"
> > > >  #define _UNICODE
> > > >
> > > >  #include <stddef.h>
> > > >  #include <tchar.h>
> > > >  main() {
> > > >         size_t len = wcslen(_T(__DIR)) + wcslen(_T("dir"));
> > > >         size_t len2 = wcslen(_TEXT(__DIR)) + wcslen(_TEXT("dir"));
> > > >         exit(len);
> > > >  }
> > > > ------  Cut Here  ------  Cut Here  ------  Cut Here  ------
> > >
> > > I do need to know if
> > >   L"dir" == L("dir")
> > > ?  The problem with this macro is the use of the macro concatenation ##
> > > and the order in which the macros are resolved.  Currently we have
> > >   #define _T(x) L ## x
> > > and if you pass a macro FOO as an argument to this macro you get LFOO
> > > returned and not the value of FOO appended to L.  If I change this to
> > >   #define _T(x) L(x)
> > > then I get returned L("bar") where "bar" is the value of FOO.  This
> > > allows the program to compile but does L"bar" == L("bar")?
> > 
> > No. I'm certain of that, more or less ...
> 
> 1) If that is true then what is the purpose of function L()?
> 2) Can someone who has MSVC++ tell me what the _T(__dir) expands to
> using the above example?
> 3) Is it legal to pass a MACRO as an argument to the _T() macro?

Sorry, Earnie, I think I misinterpreted your question - though my
brain must have been elsewhere because my interpretation didn't make
much sense. I thought you were asking if the character sequence

  L"dir"

was syntactically equivalent to the character sequence

  L("dir")

It isn't, but I'm sure you know that!

The usual way to handle this sort of thing is with a second macro
invocation to make use of rescanning of the sequence. Something like:

#define _T(x)    _T_(x)
#define _T_(x)   L ## x

Then if we start with

  _T(__DIR)

after the first pass of macro replacement we get

  _T_("dir")

and after the second pass we get

  L"dir"



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -