Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<B7F9A3E3FDDDD11185510000F8BDBBF2049E80B1@mcdc-atl-5.cdc.gov>
X-Sybari-Space:	00000000 00000000 00000000
From:	Heitzso <xxh1 AT cdc DOT gov>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: 1.1.8-2 Access violation (sshd)
Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 15:07:04 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Please work with me slowly .... I appreciate your
note that cygwin is not linux and that an unstable
dll is not as dangerous as an unstable kernel.  I'm
learning.

I use cygwin constantly at two locations and install
it on every box I come in contact with (for cvs,
ssh, tar, etc.).  So I'm a very appreciative user.
Also I'm willing to put in some time to help the
process along, i.e. I want to give as well as take.

I would have grabbed the snapshot if I could have
easily recreated the problem.  Since the problem
didn't show back up with the original condition
but newer code I didn't take the next steop.

Please don't hesitate to say "grab the snapshot"
next time I'm in the loop -- with your emphasis
on the safety of a test I'll be more likely to
jump on it.

Heitzso

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -