Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 5 Feb 2001 13:44:06 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.1.8-2 Access violation (sshd)
Message-ID:	<20010205134406.A930@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<B7F9A3E3FDDDD11185510000F8BDBBF2049E80AE AT mcdc-atl-5 DOT cdc DOT gov>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<B7F9A3E3FDDDD11185510000F8BDBBF2049E80AE@mcdc-atl-5.cdc.gov>; from xxh1@cdc.gov on Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:10:29PM -0500

On Mon, Feb 05, 2001 at 01:10:29PM -0500, Heitzso wrote:
>There were two of us reporting the register dump.  I managed to
>sidestep the problem with the user dir; hence my not downloading the
>snapshot.  Yes, I have hesitations with snapshots, not major but they
>can bite (i.e.  I walked through all of the Linux 2.4.pre series and
>trashed my filesystem when those snapshots had filesystem trashing code
>in them).

cygwin != linux.  It is very unlikely that you trash your filesystem by
replacing a DLL.

If you're not willing to test a snapshot, that's ok.  I'll but out of
this thread.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -