Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A7B6F89.4A2AD7BD@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Fri, 02 Feb 2001 21:40:09 -0500
From:	"Charles S. Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Jason Tishler <Jason DOT Tishler AT dothill DOT com>
CC:	cygwin <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Possible cygipc 1.1.8 problem (was Re: PostgreSQL 7.1 Beta 3 does
	not run under Cygwin 1.1.8)
References:	<200102010245 DOT f112jHt05966 AT rtl DOT cygnus DOT com> <20010201112937 DOT A1368 AT dothill DOT com> <20010201174647 DOT D19867 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <20010202112843 DOT A1900 AT dothill DOT com>

Jason Tishler wrote:
> 
> I haven't come up with a simple test case yet.  But, I have some more
> information that should be helpful.  It seems that the problem may
> actually be a cygipc/fork()/1.1.8 problem.  It appears that
> fixup_mmaps_after_fork() is failing on a cygipc shared memory region.
> Please see the attached strace and after gunzip-ing, search for "1E980000".
> 
> Chuck, any insight?

No, not really.  I tried out the obvious -- you know, use ipctest and
verify that "ordinary" usage of cygipc still works under 1.1.8.  It
does.  As far as why (or if) it is failing after mmap, I duuno.  Sorry.

--Chuck

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -