Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<DFF041EA401381429D93751BE9CE54784BC8B4@direxch1>
From:	Barry Buchbinder <BBUCHBINDER AT niaid DOT nih DOT gov>
To:	"Cygwin (E-mail)" <cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com>
Subject:	Re: 1.18 failed in Win 98
Date:	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:30:13 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Corinna just announced updated ash and bash.  Anyone updating them would
have noticed the new cygwin.

- Barry Buchbinder

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:55:08AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> 
>> I did set the heap chunk size to 1GB in 1.1.8.
>> 
>> I haven't officially announced this yet, are you people just polling
sources.redhat.com
>> or something?  I guess this explains why the bandwidth is always pegged
there.
>
>No, 1.1.8-1 has made it to the mirrors.  I ran setup to update to gcc-7
>to help test *that* -- and noticed that 1.1.8 was there.  I *knew* it
>was also a test release (since I read cygwin-developers) -- and wanted
>to help test it. 

It wasn't a test release.  I was waiting for it to show up on a few more
mirrors before I announced it.

My astonishment is that half a dozen people would notice this so quickly.
That leads me to believe that people are updating frequently.  Given that
the cygwin downloads on sources.redhat.com are always quite high, I imagine
that people are downloading directly despite my frequent requests not to do
this.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -