Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A76DD96.8AE21784@digitalfocus.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:28:22 -0500
From:	Daniel Barclay <Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: long command lines (off topic by now)
References:	<3A70B734 DOT A18289E AT nuance DOT com> <3A70C7CB DOT AB0DA2BE AT yahoo DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010129110023 DOT 022b0468 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <3A75E410 DOT 1E5421C3 AT digitalfocus DOT com> <20010129165942 DOT N30941 AT redhat DOT com>

Christopher Faylor wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:43:44PM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> >>
> >> At 10:52 AM 1/29/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> >> >...
> >> >I thought GNU software tried to avoid arbitrary limit like that.  Shouldn't
> >> >the only limit be virtual memory?
> >> >
...
> >> I'm sure you can find your answer in the source if you're interested.
> >
> >What's up with your attitude?
> 
> What, specifically, are you objecting to?  The suggestion that you could
> figure this out for yourself by looking at the sources?\

Yes, because this (intended behavior) is NOT something that likely can be
figured out from the sources (actual behavior).  

Daniel
-- 
Daniel Barclay
Digital Focus
Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -