delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/01/29/17:28:53

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010129170117.02253ce8@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender: lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:14:19 -0500
To: Daniel Barclay <Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject: Re: long command lines
In-Reply-To: <3A75E410.1E5421C3@digitalfocus.com>
References: <3A70B734 DOT A18289E AT nuance DOT com>
<3A70C7CB DOT AB0DA2BE AT yahoo DOT com>
<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010129110023 DOT 022b0468 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version: 1.0

At 04:43 PM 1/29/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> > 
> > At 10:52 AM 1/29/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> > >...
> > >I thought GNU software tried to avoid arbitrary limit like that.  Shouldn't
> > >the only limit be virtual memory?
> > >
> > >That is, shouldn't bash keep reallocating (enlarging) its buffer until the
> > >pattern has been expanding, or until it runs out of memory?
> > 
> > I'm sure you can find your answer in the source if you're interested.
>
>What's up with your attitude?


Why do you assume my response implies "attitude" on my part?  You asked,
"shouldn't bash keep reallocating (enlarging) its buffer until the pattern 
has been expanding, or until it runs out of memory?"  From that, I concluded
that you didn't know whether bash actually did this or not.  Looking at the 
source would tell you, which is why I made that suggestion.  If my laconic
response offended you, sorry.

  


Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019