Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:40:13 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Updated: expect-20010117-1, dejagnu-20010117-1
Message-ID:	<20010129164013.L30941@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	Cygwin-L <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<OF76CFFC5A DOT 961543C7-ON852569E3 DOT 005512BC AT nu DOT com> <200101291746 DOT MAA10227 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3A75B17B DOT A4B3DC23 AT etr-usa DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<3A75B17B.A4B3DC23@etr-usa.com>; from warren@etr-usa.com on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:07:55AM -0700

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 11:07:55AM -0700, Warren Young wrote:
>DJ Delorie wrote:
>> 
>> > You know, rather than put up with pressure on the mirror sites,
>> > wouldn't it be better to put out a CD ROM ?
>> 
>> Sure, go ahead.
>
>I had high hopes for this thread...  I was hoping someone would drop
>some hints as to when we could expect Cygwin 1.2.  :)

As far as Cygwin 1.2, I hate to burst your bubble, but if it is released
it will be a stable release based on some older version of Cygwin.

I guess we should rename the DLL to 1.3.0 now, since 1.2 should be available
in a couple of months.  It's not likely that Red Hat will be producing a
commercial computer-store version of the product, though.  Sorry.  Sigh.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -