delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-Id: | <4.3.1.2.20010129155536.022d66f0@pop.ma.ultranet.com> |
X-Sender: | lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com |
X-Mailer: | QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 |
Date: | Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:02:36 -0500 |
To: | Earnie Boyd <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
From: | "Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: Confirm or deny. |
Cc: | L Anderson <lowella AT mvseac DOT com> |
In-Reply-To: | <3A75D944.90151316@yahoo.com> |
References: | <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010129153737 DOT 022a8c20 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
At 03:57 PM 1/29/2001, Earnie Boyd wrote: >"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote: > > > > ... There is no code in Cygwin which > > checks the type of shell that's running. ... > > > >Not totally true. In theory you should notice little difference. >However, Cygwin does know if it's executing from cmd.exe/command.com and >takes some measure to ensure that the format for spawns are correct for >that shell. You will also see differences wrt binary mode vs text mode >processing. Right, but as far as Lowell's vague question is concerned, the answer is there is no difference, unless he can qualify what it means to react "Unixishly in a cygwin window and Dosishly in a Dos/Win98 window". From the user's perspective, the Cygwin tools don't react differently in one shell versus another. I choose not to assume that he's interested in details of the implementation that should make using the tools transparent no matter what the shell is. Whether my assumption is any better than yours is something only Lowell can answer. Larry Hall lhall AT rfk DOT com RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |