Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 27 Jan 2001 10:46:36 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
Message-ID:	<20010127104636.A31021@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<OFF186A1CB DOT 218CF568-ON862569D6 DOT 0076B70D AT RCHLAND DOT IBM DOT COM> <3A64D197 DOT 514DD0FA AT veritas DOT com> <200101172009 DOT WAA11316 AT linux.> <20010117154318 DOT D14952 AT redhat DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<20010117154318.D14952@redhat.com>; from cgf@redhat.com on Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500

On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 03:43:18PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 10:09:06PM +0200, Ehud Karni wrote:
>>On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:56:23 -0800, Bob McGowan <rmcgowan AT veritas DOT com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>  "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual
>>>   directory names -- none will be symbolic links."
>>> 
>>> I'd say this is a bug.
>>
>>Despite what Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com> thinks, I'll say it
>>is a real bug with critical implications.
>
>Huh?  I never said it wasn't a bug.  Quite the contrary.
>
>I suggested that people read the email archives.  Look for "pwd symlink".

I've checked in a fix for this.  It will be in cygwin 1.1.8.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -