Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Envelope-Sender-Is:	Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru (at relayer david.siemens.de)
From:	"Andrej Borsenkow" <Andrej DOT Borsenkow AT mow DOT siemens DOT ru>
To:	"Cygwin Mailing List" <Cygwin AT Sourceware DOT Cygnus DOT Com>
Subject:	PATH_MAX and FILENAME_MAX
Date:	Fri, 26 Jan 2001 13:04:43 +0300
Message-ID:	<000001c0877f$67915cf0$21c9ca95@mow.siemens.ru>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Note-from-DJ:	This may be spam

Doing something different, this caught my eyes:

$ grep PATH_MAX /usr/include/*.h
/usr/include/limits.h:#define PATH_MAX (260 - 1 /*NUL*/)
/usr/include/limits.h:#define _POSIX_PATH_MAX           255
/usr/include/stdio.h:#define    FILENAME_MAX    1024    /* must be <= PATH_MAX
<sys/syslimits.h> */
/usr/include/stdio.h:#define    L_tmpnam        1024    /* XXX must be ==
PATH_MAX */

So are comments misleading or FILENAME_MAX (and L_tmpnam) should be changed?

-andrej

Have a nice DOS!
B >>


--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -