Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A6DF605.E0D7313E@lineo.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jan 2001 13:22:13 -0800
From:	jfaith AT lineo DOT com
X-Accept-Language:	en,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com
Subject:	Using gprof on cygwin DLL
References:	<000501c084a5$033fd880$1501a8c0 AT BRAEMARINC DOT COM>
X-MIMETrack:	Serialize by Router on lnwestlake/Lineo(Release 5.0.5 |September 22, 2000) at
	01/23/2001 03:28:06 PM,
	Serialize complete at 01/23/2001 03:28:06 PM

Hello,
I would like to run gprof on some cygwin-based tools, like make or gcc.  I
assumed that rebuilding the cygwin DLL (as well as rebuilding other tools),
enabled for profiling with the "-pg" flag, would tell me where time was being
spent in cygwin itself.  Will this approach work, or does anyone have
experience doing this?  Is this even a reasonable thing to attempt?

I tried building cygwin1.dll with profiling enabled, but it looks like no tools
(bash, grep, etc.) can use the new dll.  I get an error dialog "The application
failed to initialize properly (0xc00000fd)."  I checked the static dependencies
for bash.exe against the new dll, and did not see any "red flags."

Any suggestions?

,
John Faith
Lineo



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -