Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Thu, 18 Jan 2001 14:21:25 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd
Message-ID:	<20010118142125.A32484@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<17B78BDF120BD411B70100500422FC6309E1CF AT IIS000> <200101181533 DOT RAA16886 AT linux.>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.11i
In-Reply-To:	<200101181533.RAA16886@linux.>; from ehud@unix.simonwiesel.co.il on Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 05:33:25PM +0200

On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 05:33:25PM +0200, Ehud Karni wrote:
>On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:12:12 +0100, Bernard Dautrevaux <Dautrevaux AT microprocess DOT com> wrote:
>>>I have no idea what an "immigration problem" is but you're welcome, as
>>>always to submit a patch.
>>
>>I think Ehud wanted to say a "migration problem", and that's exactly
>>what I'm afraid of for some of my scripts I have to migrate to cygwin
>>and probably why some complicated ones are broken there that I do not
>>had time to investigate ;-(
>
>You got my intention right (I'm sorry for my English mistakes).  I
>wonder why cgf did not get it, may be he does not have to do such
>chores ?

I am sorry that I did not equate immigration with migration.  I was not
casting aspersions on your command of English.  I simply did not understand
what you were talking about.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -