Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id:	<4.3.1.2.20010116141835.026d2cb0@pop.ma.ultranet.com>
X-Sender:	lhall AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:23:31 -0500
To:	Daniel Barclay <Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com>
From:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
Subject:	Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work?
Cc:	ehud AT unix DOT simonwiesel DOT co DOT il, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<3A649DDE.8E4CDA18@digitalfocus.com>
References:	<3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<3A5E32A6 DOT 557FEAE7 AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<uyg0ip3ddt DOT fsf AT tcsi DOT com>
	<3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010112164936 DOT 022cabc8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0

At 02:15 PM 1/16/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
>"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> > 
>...
> > ... However,
> > I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like
> > XEmacs.  You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other
> > Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this.
>
>How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs?  
>
>(I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about 
>default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.)



Sorry, I was a little unclear.  AFAIK, there is a Cygwin version of XEmacs
but there isn't one for NTEmacs.  My main point was that signal functionality
can be handled by Cygwin (and is) or by the O/S.  However, the signal coming
from a Win32 app doesn't get the same response out of Cygwin as one coming
from a Cygwin app.  If you have problems in this area, your best bet is to 
use Cygwin-enabled versions of apps when available.



Larry Hall                              lhall AT rfk DOT com
RFK Partners, Inc.                      http://www.rfk.com
118 Washington Street                   (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
Holliston, MA 01746                     (508) 893-9889 - FAX



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -