Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3A649DDE.8E4CDA18@digitalfocus.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jan 2001 14:15:42 -0500
From:	Daniel Barclay <Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>
CC:	ehud AT unix DOT simonwiesel DOT co DOT il, cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: NTEmacs shell/CygWin: should control-C work?
References:	<3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<3A5E32A6 DOT 557FEAE7 AT digitalfocus DOT com>
	<uyg0ip3ddt DOT fsf AT tcsi DOT com>
	<3A5F5F1C DOT 3879B2CF AT digitalfocus DOT com> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20010112164936 DOT 022cabc8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>

"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
> 
...
> ... However,
> I can say you'll have better luck with a Cygwin version of Emacs, like
> XEmacs.  You'll find Cygwin applications work much better with other
> Cygwin applications, especially in areas of detail like this.

How different is XEmacs from GNU/NTEmacs?  

(I don't do much (any) Lisp programming, so I guess I'm just asking about 
default configuration and about compatibility of add-ons like JDE.)

Thanks,
Daniel
-- 
Daniel Barclay
Digital Focus
Daniel DOT Barclay AT digitalfocus DOT com

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -