delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/01/16/12:02:00

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
X-Authentication-Warning: hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu: khan owned process doing -bs
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 11:00:16 -0600 (CST)
From: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
Reply-To: Mumit Khan <khan AT NanoTech DOT Wisc DOT EDU>
To: Yehuda Gan-El <dp61484 AT elbit DOT co DOT il>
cc: "'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject: Re: Cygwin questions
In-Reply-To: <1BA2474577B9D411ACEA00508BEECAB131B814@MAIL2>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.96.1010116105647.7454D-100000@hp2.xraylith.wisc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0

On Tue, 16 Jan 2001, Yehuda Gan-El wrote:

> Hello:
> 1)We are trying to bulid ACE/TAO on VxWorks. For doing that we have to use
> Cygwin, since our host runs on windows2000. For the building process we
> defined new user enviorment variables (like other paths in the path var, CPU
> variable etc.) We checked to see if other programs (regular C++ files) are
> femilier with the new vars, and they were. but the Cygwin did not recognize
> them.Why doe'nt the Cygwin know about the existance of these vars?

I assume you're using Cygwin just as a host and using VxWorks cross-tools 
to build for the target. That said, I'm not sure what you mean by Cygwin
not recognizing environment variables, which it certainly does. Unless you
provide some examples of what you're trying to do and how these fail under
Cygwin, I'm afraid it'll be hard to find any help here.

Cygwin strives to emulate Unix systems, and you'll need to have some
understanding of Unix-like systems work.

> 2) We did not succees to compile a simple C++ program using the gcc order.
> Do we have to do somthing special in order to be able to compile in this
> order?

Again, provide some examples please. There is no such thing as GCC order;
however, GNU linker is single-pass, and so you do need to provide the
object files and archive libraries in the right order on the command line
when linking.

> 3)Does Cygwin is femiliar with unmount ? I did not succeed to operate it!

umount.

Regards,
Mumit



--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019